Zora Neale Hurston and Langston Hughes: A Woman Scorned

December 22, 2011 

Zora Neale Hurston was in Eatonsville while Fannie Hurst was in Manhattan writing Imitation of Life suggesting there was little if any communication on the project. However that didn’t prevent Sterling Brown and Langston Hughes from accusing Zora of providing the source material. In a note to Fannie, Zora claims that as mistaken as both were she didn’t deny it and took the accusation as the highest of compliments. Sterling Brown wrote a scathing review in Opportunity magazine while the work inspired Langston Hughes spoof Limitation of Life.

Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston’s friendship lasted five years and ended in jealousy and perhaps an unrequited love. In the Spring of 1927 Langston was invited to read his poems at Fisk University’s Commencement exercises. From there he planned to do another reading in Texas but the Great Mississippi Flood cancelled those plans. A change took him South where he ran into Zora in New Orleans. She was touring the South in her own car, collecting materials for research. Together they spent several weeks driving through the rural South collecting folk songs and stories.

They returned to Harlem and Hughes introduced Hurston to his patron the “Park Avenue Godmother” Charlotte Mason. Under Charlotte Mason’s sponsorship they began to collaborate on a play Mule Bone. Mason hired a third Harlem Renaissance figure Louise Thompson to do the typing for $150 a month. Zora found Louise and Langston growing a little too cozy. Then one can only surmise by some mischief concocted by Zora, Louise was suddenly fired. Hughes wanted Louise to continue typing and offered to share author credits. Zora opposed the idea and with only two acts completed Hurston packed up and took off on another tour taking the notes and manuscript.

Despite his great affection for the Godmother Hughes was feeling controlled, beholden and with his creativity stifled their relationship deteriorated and not long after she cut him off. The financial and emotional toll stressed him into a psychosomatic illness. He returned to his mother’s home in Cleveland to recuperate. As fate would have it he discovered Hurston had copyrighted the play and was in the process of negotiating the rights with the Jelliffe’s of the Gilpin Players, the Black theater company long associated with Cleveland’s Karamu House.

Things blew up and Zora traveled to Cleveland supposedly to smooth things out admitting Langston was a co-author. But when she arrived at Langston’s home for a meeting with all the parties she discovered Louise Thompson was in town. A big blow out ensued with Zora acting out. In her crazy way she did an about face disavowed Langston’s authorship baffling the Jelliffes and disrespecting Langston mother who he had to physically restrain. He was also recovering from a tonsillectomy and barely able to talk.

The friendship never mended. Zora would later confess to Arna Bontemps how sorry she was for her behavior admitting her jealousy of Louise Thompson. A romantic entanglement is not hard to imagine. Hurston understandably was in love with Hughes. They were after all in their twenties and he was strikingly good looking. Zora didn’t mention Langston in her memoirs and he politely referenced her as Miss Hurston in his. The play would not be performed until 1991 on Broadway to negative reviews. Critics all in agreement expressed regret the play was never finished. To use Langston Hughes’ words: Girls are funny creatures.

Comments

One Response to “Zora Neale Hurston and Langston Hughes: A Woman Scorned”
  1. Dj says:

    I find the ideas that Zora acted out of jealousy to not be believable. Langston was gay and openly so, and had romantic relationships with men who they both knew — Countee Cullen being his most famous lover. Cullen married Dubois’ daughter and was known to cheat on her multiple times with Langston, Jackman and others, thus leading to a divorce. It seems that if Zora was so in love with Langston and acted out of jelousy toward another woman, who she knew Langston had no real interest in, then we would have seen this behavior directed toward Hughe’s male lovers. Zora’s sexuality was also questionable. I have poured through several hours of source material and there is nothing to indicate that Zora was in love with Langston. It seems common sense to me, that if I was writing a play with another author, the typist would not get writing credit. That alone is enough to argue about. Zora was a dramatic figure, I give you that, but this story seems to be told from the point of view of someone sympathetic to Langston. The author states that she insulted Langston’s mother. How do you know that Zora was not insulted at the meeting? The relationship between Langston and the typist also seems a bit shady. Zora was a woman working in a primarily Northern man’s world. She may have been trying not to get shortchanged. At any event, she completed the book that was only two chapters when she departed from Langston and was trying to get the work out. He apparently didn’t care about the work until returning home to Cleveland (My home town. I’ve spent a lot of time at Karamu House growing up and doing Langston Hughes plays, including Mulebone). He deserved credit, however, for his contribution to the work.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*


five + = 10

It's A Black Thang.com - Products & Gifts
One Stop Shopping For African American Products & Gifts